|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Would it make sense that if a function/variable is called with no namespace
qualifier that exists as a built-in and user defined inside a namespace that
the built-in be used? That would seem like the logical answer.
The user knew there would be a conflict, thus, he/she included the file w/the
conflict with a namespace to prevent that conflict.
Now. If you include a file w/no namespace and now you have a built-in and user
defined function of the same name, no namespace qualifier and called it with
no namespace qualifier, then I would think the application should err out as
it does now.
Matt, what do you think?
include pgsql.e as db
db:close() --- we know it's calling pgsql.e's close function
f = open(...)
close(f) --- no namespace given, use the built-in
... another example
include pgsql.e
close()
--- hm, Euphoria cannot tell if they want built-in
--- or pgsql.e's close(), therefore crash Euphoria with
--- the namespace qualifier error it currently uses
--
Jeremy Cowgar
http://jeremy.cowgar.com